|Image 1. Temperatures will be 3 degrees Celsius higher well before 2050|
Could temperatures rise faster in future than what the IPCC anticipated in 2001? The answer must be yes! In 2007, the IPCC described that, even if greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere were stabilized for 100 years at year 2000 values (B1), then we would still be committed to a further warming of 0.5°Celsius. This committed warming should not be confused with ‘unavoidable climate change’ over the next half century, which would be greater because forcing cannot be instantly stabilized. And of course, as it turned out, emissions have not been stabilized at 2000 values, but have in fact increased substantially.
|Image 3. Three kinds of warming – Part 2: Accelerated warming in the Arctic|
|Image 4. Three kinds of warming – Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3|
- IPCC (TAR) – Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report
- IPCC (AR4) – Climate Change 2007: Working Group I: The Physical Science Basis
- Accelerated Arctic Warming
Please visit Sam Carana’s Website at
The state of things today
We are in the early stages of an abrupt climate shift, driven initially by the disappearing Arctic albedo from sea ice and land snowpack. There are multiple other positive feedbacks set to come into play in the near future. We may have passed the point of no return where not even an immediate decision to deploy geoengineering could buy more time – and even if we did manage to buy more time – the prognosis for it being used to prevent the problem still looks very poor.
There is every chance that this will lead to the loss of global civilisation – widespread conflict and famine and general unpleasantness on a global scale. It is likely that this process will start in earnest sooner than it is comfortable to contemplate and be far worse than most people are capable of imagining. It is likely most people will perish.
While I think one should not entirely give up on averting catastrophe I think a realistic world view requires that one accept the possibility of failure and work on handling it. So what to do?
The first thing to do is to stop being a passive observer. I encounter an increasing number of people who seem to intellectually grasp that we’re in a very serious mess but who change nothing in their lives. Instead they either push it to the back of their mind as a tomorrow problem, or passively consume information on the internet or television and stare transfixed as the crash unfolds. So the first thing is to start – today, not tomorrow. Even today is really a bit late, but tomorrow is to declare your future not to be worth your effort.
The second thing is to arrive at a basic strategy. I can’t tell you what form that will take as it depends a great deal upon your situation – where and how you currently live. I can say that there is plenty of straight-forward survivalist advice out there that will give you a good starting point. The hierarchy of needs – food, water, shelter – and so on. You need to determine how you will achieve those in a collapse scenario. Be careful to be realistic in determining how you will achieve them. If your plan is to travel into the mountains and hunt wildlife remember millions of other people will have the same idea. It may not be a realistic plan. The basics of surviving are a pre-requisite to anything else. In my opinion the ideal is to get into a remote region where the ratio of population to natural resource is favourable and where it is effectively inaccessible to most other people.
The third thing is to understand the limitations of the usual survivalist type information. Much depends upon the specifics of the situation you are preparing for. Climate change is unique in two ways that are unhelpful in terms of common survivalist thinking. Firstly it is a long duration problem (for many thousands of years at the very least) and a lot of the survivalist thinking equips you for a short duration problem. Secondly climate change means that the very environment we depend upon may change radically around us. That means that even if you already knew how to live off the land for your area right now (for example which plants are safe to eat) that is not necessarily going to give you a longer term strategy. Do remember that no matter how much food you store and how many tools you own – all these things are finite and will wear out. It is better to be excellent at problem solving than at hoarding tonnes of gear. It is also selfish to your children to predicate your existence upon short term answers, leaving them to solve more problems later. Sound familiar? That’s because that’s the sort of thinking that led to the climate crisis – and we must change it!
Accordingly once you are happy you have planned for the initial collapse episode, you need longer term plans. I suggest learning about the earth system and understanding what is likely to happen in the areas you are likely to be inhabiting. You also need to consider how your children and grandchildren will live into the indefinite future. I think you should think about the even longer term future:
Seven generation sustainability
Unfortunately it’s easy to be lazy and short term. If our ancestors had cared about us seven generations ago – I am certain we wouldn’t have these problems today. Accordingly, we must change this attitude if we value children. Those who do not will consign their descendents either to death or to the most primitive and brutal of existences.
Finally I strongly suggest you make sure you’re on very good terms with your neighbours wherever you end up. The importance of community and social cohesion cannot be overstated. Make friends, not enemies.
|A diverse range of seeds is essential – above examples scale up rapidly from low seed|
It is beyond my comprehension at this point how anyone with children can NOT be preparing.
I would suggest that if you have children you start to help them become prepared – in ways that would make sense anyway. For example I believe children should know where food comes from. That means growing plants and raising and killing animals. They should also understand that if they value the ability to eat they should respect not only the world that provides those plants and animals but also the plant and animal itself. If one cannot respect something how can you look after it and in turn yourself?
I do not think you should lie to children, but on the other hand the truth should not be forced upon them either. Children usually have more flexible minds than adults and can arrive at their own understanding in their own time – if given as much truth as they reasonably ask for. We don’t live in utopia and you can definitely be too protective. Particularly with younger children – make sure not to tell them things you don’t want them to tell other people.
Make sure your children do not depend upon electronic gadgets and toys for emotional satisfaction. Help them to understand the simple beauty of nature and the real world. If they are old enough teach them the basic survival skills that count most. Perhaps the importance of clean water, how to make fire and how to respond to environmental stress in the form of dangerous heat and cold.
You and your children should be in good physical shape. That doesn’t necessarily mean being a toned athlete but a basic standard of physical fitness is essential. A little stored body fat might actually be a good thing but certainly not enough to affect your fitness or mobility. A little of it could help you when you are starving. I would however note to all those who think an answer is to hoard lots of food – if you are obviously well fed while those around you starve, expect them to kill you and take your food. A modest stockpile is arguably a substantial advantage but only if used wisely.
It is essential to cultivate a practical and optimistic attitude. Instead of encouraging the all too common passive mindset of waiting for someone else to solve a problem (or of saying something is simply too hard) perseverance should be encouraged, and willingness to try. Ability to learn from failure is also important.
One of my pet peeves about how most people view the end of the world is they necessarily think the loss of civilisation and the descent of the world into violent conflict is a hopeless situation. They automatically think it will be dreadful and not worth trying to survive in. I can only say that I think the collapse itself will be a finite duration event (until the population is back within carrying capacity) and that the most important thing about being civilised is how people treat each other.
One can find happiness in small simple things if one is willing to accept it! Those things will never go away for those who value them.
What if you cannot survive?
Firstly, survival is mostly in the mind. In many cases your mental attitude is the biggest factor – not your physical limitations. A couple of examples:
- Juliane Koepcke
- For 40 Years, This Russian Family Was Cut Off From All Human Contact, Unaware of WWII
Secondly, if you genuinely think yourself unable to survive in a collapsed world, I can only suggest the following:
- Do your absolute best to try to stop things from collapsing – this is by definition your best survival strategy
- Help someone else – if your good deeds can live longer than you, why not try to help future generations?